CARO 2020: Point 2 with Samples

CARO 2020

(ii) Inventory

(a) whether physical verification of inventory has been conducted at reasonable intervals by the management and whether, in the opinion of the auditor, the coverage and procedure of such verification by the management is appropriate; whether any discrepancies of 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventory were noticed and if so, whether they have been properly dealt with in the books of account;

(b) whether during any point of time of the year, the company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of five crore rupees, in aggregate, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets; whether the quarterly returns or statements filed by the company with such banks or financial institutions are in agreement with the books of account of the Company, if not, give details.

SAMPLES (FROM FY 21-22 AUDIT REPORTS OF LISTED ENTITIES)

VOLTAS LTD:

(a). The inventory has been physically verified by the management during the year except for inventories lying with third parties. In our opinion, the frequency of verification by the management is reasonable and the coverage and procedure for such verification is appropriate. Inventories lying with third parties have been confirmed by them as at March 31, 2022 and discrepancies were not noticed in respect of such confirmations.

(b). As disclosed in note 16 to the financial statements, the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of INR five crores in aggregate from banks during the year on the basis of security of current assets of the Company. Based on the records examined by us in the normal course of audit of the financial statements, the quarterly returns/statements filed by the Company with such banks are in agreement with the books of accounts of the Company.

CAMS (COMPUTER AGE MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD)

(a). The Company does not have any inventory and hence reporting under clause 3(ii)(a) of the Order is not applicable.

(b). The Company has not been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of ` 5 crore, in aggregate, at any points of time during the year, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets and hence reporting under clause 3(ii)(b) of the Order is not applicable.

LAURUS LABS LTD

(a). The inventories (except for goods-in-transit, which have been received subsequent to the year-end) were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the coverage and procedure of such verification by the Management is appropriate having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its operations. No discrepancies of 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventories were noticed on such physical verification of inventories when compared with books of account.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of ` 5 crores, in aggregate, at points of time during the year, from banks on the basis of security of current assets. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the quarterly returns or statements comprising stock statements, book debt statements, statements on ageing analysis of the debtors and other stipulated financial information filed by the Company with such banks are in agreement with the unaudited books of account of the Company of the respective quarters and no material discrepancies have been observed.

DODLA DIARY LIMITED

(a).  The inventory, except goods-in-transit, has been physically verified by the management during the year. For goods-in-transit subsequent evidence of receipts has been linked with inventory records. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable and procedures and coverage as followed by management were appropriate. No discrepancies were noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records that were more than 10% in the aggregate of each class of inventory.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of five crore rupees, in aggregate, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets. In our opinion, the quarterly returns or statements filed by the Company with such banks or financial institutions are in agreement with the books of account of the Company except as follows.

Quarter Name of bank Particulars Amount as per books of account Amount as reported in the quarterly return/ statement Amount of difference Whether return/ statement subsequently rectified
05-Apr-21 HDFC Bank, Standard Chartered Bank Sundry creditors 455.3 94.14 361.16 No
05-Jul-21 HDFC Bank, Standard Chartered Bank Sundry creditors 425.83 425.84 No
05-Oct-21 426.81 456.81 No
05-Jan-22 488.97 488.97 No
30-Jun-21 HSBC Bank, ICICI Bank and Kotak Mahindra Bank Sundry creditors 818.08 396.46 448.62 No
30-Sep-21 845.45 312.4 533.05 No
31-Dec-21 921.9 191.6 730.31 No
31-Mar-22 904.32 113.35 790.97 No

SAGAR CEMENTS LIMITED

(a). The inventories (except for goods-in-transit, which have been received subsequent to the year-end), were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals. In our opinion and based on information and explanations given to us, the coverage and procedure of such verification by the Management is appropriate having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its operations. No discrepancies of 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventories were noticed on such physical verification of inventories procedures performed as applicable, when compared with the books of account.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of ` 5 crores, in aggregate, at points of time during the year, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the quarterly returns or statements comprising stock statements, book debt statements and statements on ageing analysis of the debtors/other receivables filed by the Company with such banks or financial institutions are in agreement with the unaudited books of account of the Company of the respective quarters.

TATA CONSUMER PRODUCTS LIMITED

(a). The inventories were physically verified during the year by the Management at reasonable intervals. In our opinion, the coverage and procedure of such verification by the Management is appropriate having regard to the size of the Company and the nature of its operations. No discrepancies of 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventories were noticed on such physical verification of inventories when compared with books of account.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us, the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of Rs. 5 crores, in aggregate, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets. In our opinion and according to the information and explanations given to us, the quarterly returns or statements comprising stock statements filed by the Company with such banks or financial institutions are in agreement with the unaudited books of account of the Company of the respective quarters.

SUPREME INDUSTRIES LIMITED

(a). The inventories have been physically verified by the management at reasonable intervals during the year, except for goods in transit and those lying with third parties. The procedures of physical verification of the inventories followed by the management are reasonable and adequate in relation to the size of the Company and nature of it’s business. As per the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records, no discrepancies of 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventory were noticed on physical verification of inventories as compared to book records.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records, the Company has not been sanctioned working capital limit in excess of r 5 crores on the basis of security of current assets, in aggregate, at any point of time during the year from banks and financial institutions and hence reporting under clause 3(ii)(b) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

CERA SANITARYWARE LIMITED

(a). The inventory has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable. The Company has maintained proper records of inventory. In our opinion, the coverage and procedure of such verification by the management is appropriate. The discrepancies noticed on verification between the physical stock and the book records were less than 10% in the aggregate for each class of inventory as stated in the financial statements. Such discrepancies have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(b). During the year the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of rupees five crore, in aggregate, from State Bank of India on the basis of security of current assets. The quarterly returns / statements filed by the Company with Sate Bank of India are in agreement with the books of account of the Company.

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED

(a). The inventory has been physically verified by the management during the year. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable and procedures and coverage as followed by management were appropriate. No discrepancies were noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records that were 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventory.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of five crore rupees, in aggregate, from banks on the basis of security of current assets. In our opinion, the quarterly returns or statements filed by the Company with such banks are in agreement with the books of account of the Company.

INFOSYS LIMITED

(a). The Company does not have any inventory and hence reporting under clause 3(ii)(a) of the Order is not applicable.

(b). The Company has not been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of ₹5 crores, in aggregate, at any points of time during the year, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets and hence reporting under clause 3(ii)(b) of the Order is not applicable.

TATA MOTORS LTD

(a). As informed to us, the management has conducted physical verification of inventory [including inventory lying with third parties] at reasonable intervals during the year. In our opinion the coverage and the procedure of such verification by the management is appropriate. Discrepancies noticed on such physical verification, were less than 10% in aggregate for each class of inventory and have been properly dealt with in the books of account.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has been sanctioned working capital limits in excess of five crore rupees, in aggregate, from banks or financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets. In our opinion, the quarterly returns or statements filed by the Company with such banks or financial institutions are in agreement with the books of account of the Company except for statements filed for quarters ended 30 June 2021, 30 September 2021 and 31 December 2021 with State Bank of India, Bank of America, Citibank N.A., HDFC Bank Limited, ICICI Bank Limited, Standard Chartered Bank, Union Bank of India, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Bank of Baroda where differences were noted between the amount as per books of account for respective quarters and amount as reported in the quarterly statements. The differences were in case of Debtors amounting to ` 689 crores (amount reported – ` 3,166 crores vs amount per books of account – ` 2,477 crores), ` 490 crores (amount reported – ` 2,799 crores vs amount per books of account – ` 2,309 crores) and ` 758 crores (amount reported – ` 3,191 crores vs amount per books of account – ` 2,433 crores) for the quarter ended 30 June 2021, 30 September 2021 and 31 December 2021 respectively. Further, Creditors had a difference of ` 38 crores (amount reported – ` 3,246 crores vs amount per books of account – ` 3,208 crores) for the quarter ended 30 June 2021; and Inventory had a difference of ` 44 crores (amount reported – ` 5,472 crores vs amount per books of account – ` 5,516 crores) for the quarter ended 30 September 2021. These statements were subsequently rectified after year ended 31 March 2022 and submitted to the respective banks.

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED

(a). The inventory, except goods-in-transit and stocks lying with third parties, has been physically verified by the management during the year. For stocks lying with third parties at the year-end, written confirmations have been obtained and for goods-in-transit subsequent evidence of receipts has been linked with inventory records. In our opinion, the frequency of such verification is reasonable and procedures and coverage as followed by management were appropriate. No discrepancies were noticed on verification between the physical stocks and the book records that were more than 10% in the aggregate of each class of inventory.

(b). According to the information and explanations given to us and on the basis of our examination of the records of the Company, the Company has not been sanctioned any working capital limits in excess of five crore rupees in aggregate from banks and financial institutions on the basis of security of current assets at any point of time of the year. Accordingly, clause 3(ii)(b) of the Order is not applicable to the Company.

Scroll to Top